2010 California Marriage Protection Act PSA (#2)

March 24th, 2010 | by admin |

Learn more at http://rescuemarriage.org

Bonus video this week. The regularly scheduled episode of RNGG will be up next week.

Siv-Art Productions produced this PSA in support of the Marriage Protection Act of 2010, which will ban divorce in the state of California.

In association with Acme Comedy Productions.

Duration : 0:2:7


Technorati Tags: 2010, acme, act, ban, california, Comedy, divorce, marriage, productions, protect, Richey, siv-art, Traditional, Travis

  1. 25 Responses to “2010 California Marriage Protection Act PSA (#2)”

  2. By uzijohn on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    nofalltoofar,
    To …
    nofalltoofar,
    To leftist’s and liberals facts are nothing

    They wont be happy until this nation is a pile of smoking ashes

  3. By dland2000 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    @nofalltoofar
    Look …
    @nofalltoofar
    Look buddy, you can pretend you own the definition of satire all you want, it doesn’t change anything. This video isn’t intended mock actual facts, it’s mocking another video created by a bunch of bigots. And I’m not a liberal. I think for myself. That’s how I know that banning gay marriage is insane. I don’t let my pastor do my thinking for me. And I guarandamntee a I have a better sense of humor than you, mister everything must fit into my predefined conceptions or it’s wrong.

  4. By nofalltoofar on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    No, you’re …
    No, you’re absolutely wrong. Good satire is based on facts and truth. This one is based on misrepresentation of facts.

    Obama is a filthy cocaine addict. Great satire. Oh wait, not satire. See what I mean? Obama is a chain smoker. That’s satire.

    Geeze, for supposedly having a sense of humor, liberals aren’t too good at distinguishing its use.

  5. By dland2000 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    This IS good satire …
    This IS good satire because it DOES mock actions. It’s mocking the original conservative videos proposing that we ban gay marriage to preserve christian values. Der!

  6. By bgjohnla on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    What? Do you know …
    What? Do you know what the word propaganda the means?
    Propaganda: Spreading miss-leading information, lies or rumors to harm a person, group or institution.
    The yes on 8 campaign is what produced propaganda. Flat out lies and miss-information.
    Divorce is what is threatening heterosexual marriage not other people getting married. Wont you help us protect marriage?

  7. By ProtectMarriageLA on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    This is communist …
    This is communist propoganda !

  8. By DURound on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    more of the same? …
    more of the same? your tired
    === No.. not more of the same. I do not understand your point at all.

  9. By Keither9 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    more of the same? …
    more of the same? your tired

  10. By Lndmk227 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    Straight people …
    Straight people should focus on keeping their OWN marriages from hitting the ground before trying to control everyone else’s happiness.

    Seriously folks–gay marriage won’t hurt you. So why should homosexuals be denied their own happy ending? Are you saying a straight person is so much better an individual that they should have the freedom to marry whoever they want, while gays can’t?

    I just don’t understand why the nay-sayers are so threatened by something so stupid. Gimme a logical reason!

  11. By finleyquaye on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    Well, you are a …
    Well, you are a bigot. Educate yourself and then come to us with an opinion worth giving.

  12. By danmol78 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    Why do you support …
    Why do you support a lifestyle that is neither healthy for the human body nor natural? If an act is not healthy you cannot argue it is a civil right. Humans are in every way shape & form biologically, chemically, & physiologically wired for opposite sexual interactions. There is no comparison to same sex sodomy.

  13. By danmol78 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    There is a reason …
    There is a reason people are born with penises & vaginas & there is a reason why same sex acts have the highest rate of HIV. They are not supposed to do that! Include your answer without the schoolyard name calling bigot & homophobe when someone disagrees with you.

  14. By A440Standard on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    Yes it is actually, …
    Yes it is actually, my apologies.

  15. By slightlygone on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    are they serious?! …
    are they serious?! haha

  16. By DURound on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    You misunderstood …
    You misunderstood me. I would make those illegal acts exceptions that would permit divorce.

    Is that clearer?

  17. By A440Standard on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    Most of these are …
    Most of these are already illegal, regardless of a marriage situation.

  18. By DURound on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    I would support a …
    I would support a different version of this bill. I would agree to making certain acts illegal that would lead to divorce — including pedophilia, pederasty, abuse, felony, unreasonable failure to meet marriage obligations, etc.

  19. By HiltownJoe on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    @sivartis
    Homerun
    @sivartis
    Homerun

  20. By jfsfrnd on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    “. . .just another …
    “. . .just another video to bash conservatives and conservatism . . .’

    Pointing out inconsistencies is not bashing.

  21. By Coryashire on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    this is not bashing …
    this is not bashing conservatives… this is bashing people who hate the 14th ammendment of the constitution of the united states of america. it actually makes up alot of good points, even if in a very snarky way. dont blame the gays for wanting to marry… blame all the heterosexuals for wanting a divorce. one promotes marriage, and another destorys.

    I pitty the fool who thinks marriages came from the church. It predates the existance of judeo-christianity.

  22. By j4unumber1 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    “just another video …
    “just another video to bash conservatives and conservatism :( ”

    So, why the frown?

  23. By clubindiana4 on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    If the shoe fits….
    If the shoe fits….

  24. By nofalltoofar on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    You know, you could …
    You know, you could read with discretion and note that every single case of polygamy in the Bible ended badly for everybody involved. It kinds of leads you to believe that the Bible discourages it, albeit in a subtle way.

    And as for this being satire, I guess it speaks volumes about the credibility of the left when the only way they can poke fun at the opposition is to blatantly misuse or make up information. Good satire mocks principles and actions, not contrivances of principles.

  25. By wolfinleather on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    and in the bible …
    and in the bible you could have more than one wife and even have concubines… IE Salomon or Abraham who married his sister then slept with her maid servant hagar… That’s biblical for ya…

  26. By SnowyAgeStudios on Mar 24, 2010 | Reply

    just another video …
    just another video to bash conservatives and conservatism :(

Post a Comment