OSHO: Marriage and Children
March 6th, 2010 | by admin |
OSHO International Foundation – http://www.osho.com
Excerpt from an interview with Howard Sattler, 6PR Radio, Australia. “Freedom, to me, is the ultimate value. There is nothing higher than freedom.” -Osho
Duration : 0:10:23
25 Responses to “OSHO: Marriage and Children”
By blackbuddha20 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
hi. please don’t …
hi. please don’t misunderstand. Osho has no business. he simply want to change humanity. he simply want people to become aware. he don’t want anyone to follow him. secondly no one can contentedly with marriage. it is impossible. everyone is capable of loving many people. you cannot love one person alone.
By pmarun83 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
he preaches dont …
he preaches dont follow or obey anybody rather than ur own heart….and he forget that it will apply to him too…people doesnt need to follow him too…listen him but dont follow him..in his words be a rebel ….if that happens to everybody then his business is no more….think think think..
if ur heart says u can live contentedly with marraige then its fine and well and good nothing wrong in that…but remember to live an authenticate life to each rather than a normal marraige mundane things
By kwaenchanayo on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
Osho probably …
Osho probably didn’t see it coming but in a way the “Internet” can be thought of as that community today.
By Simon0 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
do you think Osho …
do you think Osho believes all he says, or does he sometimes just talk to joke or shock?
By satishimf on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
funny…hits you …
funny…hits you with truth…lol..
By joanofarcxxi on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
marriage is not the …
marriage is not the cause of the problems in the world. that’s absurd.
he lived as he wanted to. that was his choice. marriage is totally ok if you believe it is right for you. his philosophy on children’s care is absurd. it’s against nature. besides, we don’t live in a world with a “community” to take care of other people’s children. why have children to begin with if you as a parent are not going to be responsible for them? he has a very negative view of marriage and family.
By divinecoop on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
Nope not feeling …
Nope not feeling this one… others yeap!
On children I feel is great ideas… very rich talk…
By gmsalves on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
thanks osho
thanks osho
By screenflicker1 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
@tanpm0620 Snotra, …
@tanpm0620 Snotra, did you use objective and critical thinking before posting this message? I bet not. If you would have, you wouldn’t even have brought the question of “god” last in the sentence. Your statement here is nothing but an old repetative rhetoric coming from old monotonous social conditioning, something you dread challenging.
By 8thArmada on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
lol!
lol!
By unicyclistskater on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
He is so funny.
He is so funny.
By 12345678981540 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
u got it just when …
u got it just when i thought people never see osho was always in the now.santosh anam
By druckeradam on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
smart men.
smart men.
By mrboombasticx on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
I really like his …
I really like his last statement. I agree that there is a certain richness to life through varied interactions with others.
By melimelomaniac on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
@mackawy
says *
@mackawy
says *
By icemanspyda on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
can someone tell me …
can someone tell me why this guy doesnt blink? i guess he has made a concious decision not to but y????
By vivalanovus on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
I agree; to a …
I agree; to a degree. But through everything I have learned of silence and words, nothing I can say can convey the meaning he derives.
But. There is nothing in here against attachment “per se” or marriage, but merely a task, or a challenge, to be met. According to OSHO, and my own discovery, awareness in any condition can free one from the bounds of conditioning.
By tobiaslarsgunnar on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
Yes, —
it depends …
Yes, —
it depends on who is asking…
and the situation…
no fixed ‘rules’ work in a fluid, dynamic universe,
where we are the ‘rule’.
By MrSunny29 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
Osho as usual loved …
Osho as usual loved contradictions ,,, he said tht marriage is an individual decision and at some other place in his writings he did not opposed marriage. Here he is giving his view point according to the situation
By lubarri7 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
I’ve been a …
I’ve been a follower of Osho’s words but I respectfully disagree in this occasion I think a thought irresponsible and retrograde to confuse freedom and commitment you can have freedom of choice of with whom to share life or marriage otherwise you will have children without parents who will be a burden to society of a parent they will be orphans of a still living dad who dosent see for them and not go for it. coooool a mr Osho?
By preahmaha on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
this is somehow …
this is somehow misunderstood,..you’ll need to know more about (why are two people come together)??I’m disagree with this video..
it is a person or individual opinion or opinions about married,..here.answer!love by one not by million. C if U people get that??
By BoxingPride on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
nothing but truth.. …
nothing but truth…this is why I’m never gonna get married and I’m happy that I am single.
By DJChinChin on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
LOL…
LOL…
By infiniteawareness1 on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
what are we doing …
what are we doing all living in pure ignorance when truth is really all that matters to our soul, the source of what gave us this reality.
By asc3asc3asc on Mar 6, 2010 | Reply
@Snotra it is …
@Snotra it is amazing how someone like you who is deeply involved with music and musical bands condemns emotions and feelings so categorically.
Perhaps your statements are the hidden outcry of your conscience who is so sick and tired of the perpetual emotivity and buffoonery that you have chosen to practice.
Although this man might be able to gaze into your soul at the blink of an eye, please do not revile him. This world is enslaved in prejudice because there are too few a people like him.